<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>danieltenner.com - Latest Comments in danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltennercom.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://danieltennercom.disqus.com/danieltennercom_mdash_what_problems_does_google_wavenbspsolve/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 11:49:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-506153879</link><description>&lt;p&gt;mrady&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">همست عتاب</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 11:49:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-376428641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Rizzoma.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Rizzoma.com"&gt;Rizzoma.com&lt;/a&gt; has re-engineered Google Wave gettingrid of bad shit, leaving the best features andadding many new adjuvants.Try Rizzoma if you are looking:- for alternative solution to Google Wave- to continue to work with your waves- for new and improved UX in collaborative communications&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vital1103</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 21:49:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-68184605</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not exactly sure which additional problems it created, since it basically wasn't used. I don't think that those who did use it suffered much of an exacerbated problem in online communication. To extend the medical analogy, Wave was less iatrogenic than simply ineffective, as a solution to the problem it was allegedly supposed to solve (a specific type of email correspondance).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What's interesting, though, is that it did reveal other things about the way we can communicate. It did bring to the fore some issues with the way we do things. For instance, it showed the importance of &lt;em&gt;ad hoc&lt;/em&gt; groups and the power of integrating realtime collaboration with social graphs . Sure, Gmail and Google Groups probably had similar effects. But Wave was a more radical shift and it's still likely that similar approaches will be part of the future of online communication.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With Wave, Google overpromised and underdelivered. Their launch strategy wasn't appropriate. Plus, unlike Twitter, they failed to adapt to people's usage patterns with Wave. But Wave was still something of a turning point in terms of social media tools and web applications.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To my mind, it was the same kind of failure as the OLPC XO. There were some specific problems with the ways both projects were handled, but the XO helped expand the netbook market and Wave can still inspire "a whole generation of" social media tools and web applications. Not only clones and open implementations of Wave itself. But new services which use the lessons from Wave to solve these problems we've been having for so long.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Enkerli</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 10:20:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-68173658</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Daniel,&lt;br&gt;Wave is alive and well at &lt;a href="http://wavelook.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://wavelook.com"&gt;http://wavelook.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We've just released our Wave client for Microsoft Outlook that has a unified inbox (emails and waves in the same inbox)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We are working on a Wave webapp that will let you sign into any wave server (sign up for beta waiting list at &lt;a href="http://wavelook.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://wavelook.com"&gt;http://wavelook.com&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And we are working on a Wave server that will run in the cloud or you can deploy locally so that you can migrate your data from Google Wave (sign up for beta waiting list at &lt;a href="http://wavelook.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://wavelook.com"&gt;http://wavelook.com&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So if you like Wave, you can still keep using it. It's not going anywhere.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Contact us for more info: info@wavelook.com &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wave Look</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:33:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-66979462</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google Wave suffered from the Sevareid Effect.  It created more problems than it solved.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://moultonlava.blogspot.com/2007/05/sevareid-effect.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://moultonlava.blogspot.com/2007/05/sevareid-effect.html"&gt;http://moultonlava.blogspot...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mokita Syzygy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 08:44:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-45400619</link><description>&lt;p&gt;=D boobs&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">keiranrerrer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:11:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-43455408</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google wave!! oh man. Its so complicated. Very bad user interface!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AForApple</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:27:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-35958925</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great analysis!  You sound like someone who knows a great deal about GWave.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.googlewavehelp.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.googlewavehelp.net"&gt;http://www.googlewavehelp.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hubrid</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:14:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-34095289</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice summary - I'm looking to use a Wave in lieu of a boring forum on my site - I think once people actually use it and experience some Wave collaboration they'll soon 'get it'&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">clivemg56</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 06:14:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-27915439</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Tes,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We are looking at various ways to expand Woobius to include more communication/reporting features.. Those ideas are all on the table, it's just a matter of prioritising them and allocating people to doing them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Tenner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:02:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-27914697</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Luke!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For what it's worth, I sent an invite to someone a week ago and it went through in minutes, so I guess the system is starting to work better...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Tenner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 12:55:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-27908847</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Daniel, like you I am really excited about the potential that Google Wave offers and am unsatisfied with the functionality currently offered by regular email apps. I also took a look at Woobius, and like it a lot (I actually prefer it to Huddle which I am currently using). What I really want to be able to do is employ a Workflow tool to log project progress, monitor configurable RAG or status milestones (visual)  with  with automated messaging updates to project members &amp;amp; collaborators. I can't understand why this kind of functionality hasn't been implemented yet. I saw the 'projects at a glance' feature added in May. Could this milestones feature be something you could incorporate in Woobius? It is something I was thinking about implementing in Wave, but I have only just begun to test out Wave features... a long way to go.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tesmacpherson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 12:06:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-27887616</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can't say that Gwave is not social media. If that is true why are your Gwave contacts wired into Google Friend Connect, Google Reader sharing and Gmail?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Second no one should be telling anyone what Google Wave is for. It is what ever we want it to be. I myself have over 800 friends in Google Friend Connect so I use Gwave to shout and discuss blog posts and videos from YouTube that I find interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Third, why if Gwave is not social media can I create a public wave, tag it with keywords others are searching Gwave for and have a public discussion with anyone that joins in? Try it, I met 99 new people on a public wave about the Google OS. Most know more about the subject than me and I learned a lot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Don't get me wrong here, I loved your post and it was very insightful. But you can't tell anyone what Wave is for because it is anything we want it to be. It is a platform for development, not a piece of software dedicated to the creators purpose. Open source at it's best...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Lang</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 09:29:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-27883297</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, you are damned right. If Google is smart they will soon start to push into business environments with many processes and documents. Google Wave is definitely a possible disrupting technology for the ECM/document management industry. Hardware will archive, the operating system will include search and versioning and Wave be a repository for transactional processes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">matthias1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 08:12:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-26235597</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From your analysis, it seems logical that Google *should* be adding Google Wave as a feature of Google Apps (aimed at the business community)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Edd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:04:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-26155553</link><description>&lt;p&gt;great article! all i was able to say, to the many people who don't get wave, was "it's great for companies." now i can send your excellent breakdown.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iquanyin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:04:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-26047651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Daniel, good description of how Wave can be used. Does anyone know how long invites are taking to go through now though? I was in the first batch invited by Google but when I invited people at the time it took over a week for invites to arrive. Hard to sell something to colleagues if they can't immediately access it and play&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luke</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:50:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-25903722</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is absolutely correct. I am an independent graphic designer/web developer and I work with multiple clients. I got really excited about wave for project management reasons only, and I still am...and I hope it does get quick penetration more quickly for that reason. I also look forward to it spilling outside of internal company project management. We all have too much going on: clubs, social events, trip planning with groups of people...wave really is the sane approach to email for the modern and engaged person in all aspects of life. I personally run a small business, have a rental property and organize countless other things with friends and family, wave would enhance organization of my whole life if others were using it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alicia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:16:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-25867750</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent.&lt;br&gt;I didn't know what Wave was until I got an invite. I started to use it and it was all intuitive, which is another recommendation for it. Corporates don't like complicated. I think it is a brilliant tool from a brilliant team.&lt;br&gt;Kudos to Google. &lt;br&gt;again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cyberdoyle</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:07:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-25865312</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While it's clear that true geeks care much less about filtering spam than do end users, there's still something to be said about a geek perspective on email being much more oriented toward filtering out unwanted messages than toward facilitating complex interactions through email. The point about geeks not caring for new solutions to email's actual problems probably stands but that statement might be rephrased to represent more accurately the geek view of email. For one thing, geeks tend to dislike long emails, which goes with the notion that they don't perceive emails as a core part in a deeper form of interaction. In fact, to many geeks, email is mainly a way to ping someone or to add a "to do" item to a list. It's not a medium in which thorough discussions are likely to happen or "real work" likely to get done.&lt;br&gt;Geeks aiming at mailbox zero perceive diverse forms of non-spam communication as actual spam. Some of this is included in the concept of "bacn," which was tossed around in some geek circles for a little while, a few years ago. But the idea is still the same: geeks fight email in terms of load, not in terms of depth.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Enkerli</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:29:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-25863113</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You wrote "To most geeks, the main problem with email is spam." I disagree geeks don't have spam problem. They have solved that problem years ago. People with spam problem are called end users. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">samy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:04:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-25838340</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Personally, I detest the web interface as well - I am looking forward to when people start making desktop applications, or integrating existing applications into Google Wave (Thunderbird for Wave, anyone?).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">the_madman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:00:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-25228317</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No I wonder I dont get it it....its a tool for big wigs to blah blah more without getting off their fat asses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lovely...go wave! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jared</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:46:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-25208285</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the excellent analysis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am referring to and building on your work in my recently released presentation on &lt;br&gt;"Why and how the Enterprise should harness the power of Google Wave" available at slideshare&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.slideshare.net/dparnas/why-and-how-the-enterprise-can-harness-the-power-of-google-wave" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.slideshare.net/dparnas/why-and-how-the-enterprise-can-harness-the-power-of-google-wave"&gt;http://www.slideshare.net/d...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dparnas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:39:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: danieltenner.com &amp;mdash; What problems does Google Wave&amp;nbsp;solve?</title><link>http://danieltenner.com/posts/0012-google-wave.html#comment-25048203</link><description>&lt;p&gt;check out what is google wave: &lt;a href="http://whatisgooglewave.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="whatisgooglewave.com"&gt;whatisgooglewave.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">vezign</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:14:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>